Monday, June 9, 2025
HomeMarketWhy traditional retirement accounts have become the worst asset for estate planning

Why traditional retirement accounts have become the worst asset for estate planning

-

[ad_1]

Listen and subscribe to Decoding Retirement on Apple Podcasts, Spotify, or wherever you find your favorite podcasts.

Those saving for retirement have long viewed traditional individual retirement accounts (IRAs) as the ultimate savings vehicle, offering pre-tax savings, tax-free growth, and a good deal for beneficiaries of inherited IRAs.

However, people should stop thinking that’s the case, according to Ed Slott, author of “The Retirement Savings Time Bomb Ticks Louder.”

Recent legislative changes have stripped IRAs of all their redeeming qualities, Slott said in a recent episode of Decoding Retirement (see video above or listen below). They are now “probably the worst possible asset to leave to beneficiaries for wealth transfer, estate planning, or even to get your own money out,” he stated.

Many American households have an IRA. As of 2023, 41.1 million US households owned about $15.5 trillion in individual retirement accounts, with traditional IRAs accounting for the largest share of this total, according to the Investment Company Institute.

Slott, who is widely regarded as America’s IRA expert, explained that IRAs were a good idea when they were first created. “You got a tax deduction, and beneficiaries could do what we used to call the stretch IRA, he said. “So it had some good qualities.”

But IRAs were always tough to work with because of the minefield of distribution rules, he continued. “It was like an obstacle course just to get your money out,” Slott said. “Your own money. It was ridiculous.”

According to Slott, IRA account owners put up with the minefield of rules because the benefits on the back end were a good deal. “But now those benefits are gone,” Slott said.

IRAs were especially attractive once because of the “stretch IRA” benefit that allowed the beneficiary of an inherited IRA to stretch required withdrawals over 30, 40, or even 50 years, potentially spreading out tax payments and allowing the account to grow tax-deferred for a longer period.

However, recent legislative changes, particularly the SECURE Act, have eliminated the stretch IRA withdrawal strategy and replaced it with a 10-year rule that now requires most beneficiaries to withdraw the full account balance within a decade, potentially causing significant tax implications.

Read more: 3 ways retirees can save on taxes

That 10-year rule is a tax trap waiting to happen, according to Slott. If forced to take required minimum distributions (RMDs), many Americans may find themselves paying taxes on those withdrawals at higher rates than they anticipated.

[ad_2]

Source link

LATEST POSTS

WitchSpin Casino: Daily ₱777 Bonus Explained

Online casinos attract players by offering exciting games and generous bonuses. One of the most popular features of WitchSpin Casino is its daily ₱777 bonus....

Gaming and Adventure Combined: The Ultimate Guide for Norwegian Tourists

For many Norwegian tourists, traveling is all about exploring new places, immersing themselves in different cultures, and seeking unforgettable adventures. But what if your journey...

Non-Disclosure Agreement for Customer Privacy Protection

In today's digital age, privacy concerns are more significant than ever, especially when it comes to safeguarding the personal and sensitive information of customers. Businesses...

How to Analyze Odds for a Spot Bet

The adrenaline rush of Spot Bet—placing wagers while the action unfolds—attracts countless sports enthusiasts seeking to capitalize on their real-time insights. Yet beneath this thrilling...

Most Popular

spot_img