Saturday, July 12, 2025
HomeMarketWhy traditional retirement accounts have become the worst asset for estate planning

Why traditional retirement accounts have become the worst asset for estate planning

-

[ad_1]

Listen and subscribe to Decoding Retirement on Apple Podcasts, Spotify, or wherever you find your favorite podcasts.

Those saving for retirement have long viewed traditional individual retirement accounts (IRAs) as the ultimate savings vehicle, offering pre-tax savings, tax-free growth, and a good deal for beneficiaries of inherited IRAs.

However, people should stop thinking that’s the case, according to Ed Slott, author of “The Retirement Savings Time Bomb Ticks Louder.”

Recent legislative changes have stripped IRAs of all their redeeming qualities, Slott said in a recent episode of Decoding Retirement (see video above or listen below). They are now “probably the worst possible asset to leave to beneficiaries for wealth transfer, estate planning, or even to get your own money out,” he stated.

Many American households have an IRA. As of 2023, 41.1 million US households owned about $15.5 trillion in individual retirement accounts, with traditional IRAs accounting for the largest share of this total, according to the Investment Company Institute.

Slott, who is widely regarded as America’s IRA expert, explained that IRAs were a good idea when they were first created. “You got a tax deduction, and beneficiaries could do what we used to call the stretch IRA, he said. “So it had some good qualities.”

But IRAs were always tough to work with because of the minefield of distribution rules, he continued. “It was like an obstacle course just to get your money out,” Slott said. “Your own money. It was ridiculous.”

According to Slott, IRA account owners put up with the minefield of rules because the benefits on the back end were a good deal. “But now those benefits are gone,” Slott said.

IRAs were especially attractive once because of the “stretch IRA” benefit that allowed the beneficiary of an inherited IRA to stretch required withdrawals over 30, 40, or even 50 years, potentially spreading out tax payments and allowing the account to grow tax-deferred for a longer period.

However, recent legislative changes, particularly the SECURE Act, have eliminated the stretch IRA withdrawal strategy and replaced it with a 10-year rule that now requires most beneficiaries to withdraw the full account balance within a decade, potentially causing significant tax implications.

Read more: 3 ways retirees can save on taxes

That 10-year rule is a tax trap waiting to happen, according to Slott. If forced to take required minimum distributions (RMDs), many Americans may find themselves paying taxes on those withdrawals at higher rates than they anticipated.

[ad_2]

Source link

LATEST POSTS

Ceritafilm Explores the Heart of Every Movie Through Story Reviews

Introducing ceritafilm: Where Movies Meet Meaningful Stories In a world flooded with movie ratings, short reviews, and spoiler-filled discussions, https://ceritafilm.com stands out by offering something truly...

How to Standardise Laptop Setup for Staff: Creating Consistent Configurations

In today’s fast-paced business environment, ensuring that every employee’s laptop is set up consistently is more important than ever. A standardised laptop setup helps streamline...

Turn Health into Wealth with LifeWave X39

In today’s world, people are searching for two things more than ever:✅ Better health✅ Financial freedom With LifeWave X39, you don’t have to choose — you...

Soft Play Bus Essex with Squeeze Rollers & Dizzy Discs – A Fun-Filled Mobile Adventure

In today’s world of children’s entertainment, finding activities that combine physical play with safety and creativity can be a challenge. The Soft Play Bus Essex offers a...

Most Popular

spot_img